$ 0.00 USD
$ 0.00 USD
$ 0.00 0.00 USD
$ 0.00 USD
$ 0.00 USD
$ 0.00 USD
$ 0.00 USD
$ 0.00 USD
0.00 0.00 POL
Issue Time
2020-04-10
Platform pertained to
--
Current coin price
0.00
Market Cap
$0.00USD
Volume of Transaction
24h
$0.00USD
Circulating supply
0.00POL
Volume of Transaction
7d
$0.00USD
Change
24h
0.00%
Number of Markets
Current Rate0
0.00USD
WikiBit has marked the token as air coin project for we have received overwhelming complaints that this token is a Ponzi Scheme. Please be aware of the risk!
3H
0.00%
1D
0.00%
1W
0.00%
1M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
All
0.00%
Aspect | Information |
Short name | POL |
Full name | Proof of Liquidity token |
Founded year | 2019 |
Main founders | Jake Brukhman, Aleksandr Bulkin |
Support exchanges | KuCoin |
Storage wallet | Metamask, Trust Wallet |
Proof of Liquidity (POL) is a unique type of cryptocurrency that operates on a different principle than some of its counterparts like Proof of Stake (PoS) or Proof of Work (PoW). The POL mechanism entails a consensus algorithm where the creation of new blocks and the security of the network depend on the liquidity provided by the participants. Simply put, the more liquidity participants provide, the more power they have in the network.
Different facets of the POL mechanism include the introduction of liquidity mining, decreased transaction costs, and increased transaction speed due to the constant pool of liquidity. However, it's important to be aware that the potential for higher returns with liquidity mining also comes with a higher risk. Like any other investment, the value can fluctuate, which can lead to possible losses.
POL has been adopted by several projects in the crypto space to solve problems inherent in PoW and PoS systems. Notwithstanding, it also poses its own challenges, particularly around potential centralization risks if a few players control the majority of the liquidity.
As a relatively new concept in the blockchain space, further understanding of POL cryptocurrency will need more widespread use and further research. The success, acceptance, and viability of POL as a consensus model will largely depend on how effectively it can address the issues of security, scalability, and decentralization, which are strategic objectives for any blockchain network.
Pros | Cons |
Liquidity mining offers high potential returns | Higher risk compared to other consensus models |
Decreased transaction costs | Centralization due to dominance of large liquidity holders |
Increase in transaction speed | Relatively new and untested |
Potential to solve problems inherent in PoW and PoS systems | Face scalability and security challenges |
Pros:
1. Liquidity Mining Offers High Potential Returns: Liquidity mining is a process that allows investors to earn rewards by providing liquidity to a particular cryptocurrency pool. This can offer potentially high returns because rewards are proportional to the liquidity provided.
2. Decreased Transaction Costs: A constant pool of liquidity in the network can lead to a decrease in transaction costs. This is due to the fact that with more liquidity, cryptocurrency transactions can occur more efficiently and quickly, leading to lower costs.
3. Increase in Transaction Speed: Along with decreased transaction costs, the constant liquidity pool also potentially increases transaction speed. This is because, with more available assets in the pool, transactions can be processed faster.
4. Potential to Solve Problems in PoW and PoS Systems: POL, by design, could potentially address some issues seen in Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS) systems. These systems have been criticized for their energy consumption and potential for centralization, respectively. As a different consensus model, POL could be a solution to these issues.
Cons:
1. Higher Risk: While the returns from liquidity mining can be high, it's important to note that there is a significant level of risk involved. Investments can fluctify in value, which could lead to potential losses.
2. Centralization: Despite its potential to solve centralization issues seen in PoW and PoS systems, POL faces its own centralization problems. This could occur if a few large holders control most of the liquidity in the network.
3. Relative Newness: As a relatively new concept, POL has not been as widely tested as other consensus models like PoS or PoW. This relative unfamiliarity could present uncertainty and risk.
4. Scalability and Security Challenges: As with any other blockchain technology, POL faces the challenge of meeting security standards whilst also increasing its scale to accommodate a growing user base. The effectiveness of the POL model in managing these challenges remains a crucial point to observe.
Proof of Liquidity (POL) brings a novel approach to the world of cryptocurrencies by relying on the liquidity provided by participants to create new blocks and secure the network. This consensus algorithm differs significantly from others such as Proof of Stake (PoS) or Proof of Work (PoW) that are based on the ownership of coins or computational power respectively.
One unique element of POL is the incorporation of liquidity mining. This allows participants to earn higher rewards based on the level of liquidity they contribute, introducing a potential incentive for consistent and active participation in the network. The increased liquidity can lead to faster transaction speed and lower transaction costs, optimizing the overall operation of the blockchain network.
However, it's pertinent to note that along with these innovations, POL also introduces its own set of challenges. These include a higher risk associated with liquidity mining, and potential centralization threats if a few players end up controlling major chunks of the network's liquidity.
In contrast, other cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (employing PoW) or Ethereum (moving from PoW to PoS), rely on miners solving complex mathematical problems or on stakeholders with a significant quantity of coins to validate new transactions and create new blocks. Here, the emphasis is on computational power or the proportion of coins held, as opposed to the liquidity provided in POL.
In essence, POL represents a shift towards a more dynamic, usage-based approach in the realm of cryptocurrencies, but its efficacy and future still require more extensive use and research. The potential it holds to resolve issues related to other consensus models is a subject that demands further investigation, but the innovation is undeniable.
Proof Of Liquidity (POL) operates under a unique consensus mechanism that relies on liquidity provided by the network's participants. It's different from Proof of Stake (PoS) or Proof of Work (PoW) which rely on the amount of cryptocurrency a user holds or the computing power contributed for mining respectively.
In a POL model, the generation of new blocks and the overall security of the blockchain network is dependent on the liquidity supplied by the network's users. The basics of the functioning principle are fairly straightforward – the more liquidity a participant provides to the network, the more control or power they have within the network.
A key aspect of the POL model is liquidity mining. In liquidity mining, participants provide liquidity to a cryptocurrency pool and receive rewards in return. The rewards they receive are in proportion to the amount of liquidity they initially supplied - the larger the liquidity provision, the larger the potential returns.
Furthermore, due to the constant pool of liquidity, transaction processes within a POL network are often faster, more efficient, and come with decreased costs. This comes from the fact that a high liquidity reduces the time taken to find a buyer or seller for the transaction.
However, it's noteworthy that while the POL model introduces potential improvements over PoW or PoS models, it also brings with it unique challenges. For example, it has a higher investment risk due to the fluctuations in the value of the liquidity provided. In addition, it raises potential concerns over centralization if a few players end up controlling the majority of networks liquidity.
POLs working principle is centered on utilization of network resources and hinges on network participation. This makes it a potentially more dynamic and engaging model but also one packed with its own set of hurdles and issues requiring in-depth analysis and understanding.
Price Fluctuation:
POL is a volatile asset, and its price fluctuates frequently. This is due to a number of factors, including the overall cryptocurrency market conditions, the supply and demand for POL, and news and events related to the Pool-X exchange.
Mining Cap:
POL is not mined. Instead, it is issued by Pool-X. There is a total supply of 100 million POL tokens.
Total Circulating Supply:
The total circulating supply of POL is approximately 50 million tokens as of September 26, 2023.
Price Fluctuation:
The price of POL has fluctuated significantly since its launch in 2019. It reached an all-time high of $0.50 in February 2021, but it has since fallen to around $0.10 as of September 26, 2023.
The price fluctuation of POL is likely due to a number of factors, including the overall cryptocurrency market conditions, the supply and demand for POL, and news and events related to the Pool-X exchange. For example, the price of POL fell sharply in May 2022 after the Pool-X exchange was hacked.
Proof of Liquidity (POL) is a token that is listed and available for purchase on the KuCoin cryptocurrency exchange platform. However, like any other investment, buying cryptocurrencies like POL should be approached with diligence and careful consideration of the associated risks.
Q: What kind of wallets are suitable for storing POL tokens?
A: Some reputable wallets for storing POL tokens are Metamask and Trust Wallet, with both supporting ERC-20 tokens.
Q: What sets POL apart from other cryptocurrencies?
A: POL differentiates itself through its emphasis on liquidity mining, commitment to decentralized governance, and unique approach to staking in its ecosystem.
Q: Can POL tokens be mined using traditional mining processes?
A: POL tokens are not mined through traditional processes, but are instead earned through engagement with the platform, specifically in liquidity mining and staking.
Q: Which investors might find POL a suitable investment?
A: Those interested in decentralized governance, liquidity mining, or looking for a long-term investment and comfortable with market risk might find POL a suitable investment.
Q: Will the POL token necessarily generate profits or appreciate in value?
A: There are no guarantees for profits or appreciation in value with POL as its success is subject to many factors including market conditions, adoption rates, and the performance of its platform.
Investing in cryptocurrencies requires an understanding of potential risks, including unstable prices, security threats, and regulatory shifts. Thorough research and professional guidance are advised for any such investment activities, recognizing these mentioned risks are just part of a wider risk environment.
eToro has announced the launch of staking for NEAR Protocol (NEAR) and Polygon (POL). According to t
2024-12-03 18:18
Polygon crypto has witnessed significant whale activity, with over 59 million POL tokens bought in j
2024-11-30 09:04
In recent times, Polygon (POL), the most popular layer two scaling solution for Ethereum, has seen a
2024-09-24 04:14
MATIC and POL prices soared over 2% today, after the leading crypto exchange, Coinbase revealed a cr
2024-09-18 10:00
Binance‘s latest token listing is drawing significant attention from traders as Polygon’s MATIC unde
2024-09-16 18:12
POL, a brand-new asset of the largest PoS ecosystem Polygon, jumps into the best performers in the t
2024-09-15 05:18
Binance has announced that it has added Polygon (POL) to a number of its products and services, expa
2024-09-13 20:03
Coinbase International Exchange has announced perpetual futures listing for Polygon (POL) and Dogs (
2024-09-13 11:00
Polygon, the Ethereum sidechain, recently upgraded, kickstarting their migration into a new era of s
2024-09-12 08:00
2 ratings